Portland Timbers vs Minnesota United — MLS result and pre-match forecast, Sunday, 6 September 2026

MLS·Sunday, 6 September 2026

Metis pre-match forecast

Market-anchored distribution

Frozen as published · 18.6 h before kick-off. Never re-computed after the match.

Portland Timbers

41%

pick · result

Draw

25%

Minnesota United

34%

Final score

5–4

Top pick landed

Metis gave a Portland Timbers win 41.2% before kick-off, and its most likely result was a Portland Timbers win. Expected goals 1.69–1.55 against 5–4 actual.

Forecast against the result

Over 2.5 goals63%9 scored
Both teams score65%yes
Portland Timbers clean sheet21%no
Minnesota United clean sheet18%no
Portland Timbers score 2+51%yes
Minnesota United score 2+46%yes

How this forecast scored

Ranked probability score0.2292
1X2 Brier score0.5222
Probability on the result41.2%

Both scores are losses: lower is better, 0 is a forecast that put all of its probability on what happened. A single fixture says nothing on its own — the league's running record is on its league page, and the model is measured against the Pinnacle opening price in the methodology.

Most likely scores before kick-off: 1–1 (11.3%), 2–1 (9.1%), 1–2 (7.4%). It finished 5–4.

Want the model's read each week? Subscribe for free.

Recent form

Portland Timbers

22 FebHvs Columbus Crew3–2W
28 FebAvs Colorado Rapids0–2L
8 MarHvs Vancouver Whitecaps1–4L
15 MarAvs Houston Dynamo2–3L
22 MarHvs Los Angeles Galaxy1–1D

Minnesota United

22 FebAvs Austin FC2–2D
28 FebHvs FC Cincinnati1–0W
8 MarAvs Nashville SC1–3L
15 MarAvs Vancouver Whitecaps0–6L
22 MarHvs Seattle Sounders0–0D

Head to head

No previous meetings in the Metis results archive for this competition.

Model context

StatPortland Timbers
(Home · 14 matches)
Minnesota United
(Away · 14 matches)
BTTS rate85.7%85.7%
Over 2.5 rate85.7%85.7%
Clean sheet7.1%7.1%
Avg goals4.004.21

Home stats use Portland Timbers's home record; away stats use Minnesota United's away record this season. These are completed-match rates over the samples shown above, not model probabilities — early in a season a handful of matches produces 0% and 100% readings.