New York City vs New England Revolution — MLS result and pre-match forecast, Thursday, 10 September 2026

MLS·Thursday, 10 September 2026

Metis pre-match forecast

Market-anchored distribution

Frozen as published · 20.7 h before kick-off. Never re-computed after the match.

New York City

43%

top pick

Draw

26%

New England Revolution

31%

result

Final score

1–2

Top pick missed

Metis gave a New England Revolution win 31.1% before kick-off, and its most likely result was a New York City win. Expected goals 1.73–1.44 against 1–2 actual.

Forecast against the result

Over 2.5 goals61%3 scored
Both teams score64%yes
New York City clean sheet24%no
New England Revolution clean sheet18%no
New York City score 2+51%no
New England Revolution score 2+42%yes

How this forecast scored

Ranked probability score0.3301
1X2 Brier score0.7272
Probability on the result31.1%

Both scores are losses: lower is better, 0 is a forecast that put all of its probability on what happened. A single fixture says nothing on its own — the league's running record is on its league page, and the model is measured against the Pinnacle opening price in the methodology.

Most likely scores before kick-off: 1–1 (11.7%), 2–1 (8.9%), 1–2 (7.5%). It finished 1–2 — one of them.

Want the model's read each week? Subscribe for free.

Recent form

New York City

23 FebAvs Los Angeles Galaxy1–1D
1 MarAvs Philadelphia Union2–1W
7 MarHvs Orlando City5–0W
14 MarHvs Colorado Rapids3–1W
22 MarHvs Inter Miami2–3L

New England Revolution

22 FebAvs Nashville SC1–4L
28 FebAvs New York Red Bulls0–1L
15 MarHvs FC Cincinnati6–1W
22 MarAvs St. Louis City1–3L
4 AprHvs CF Montreal3–0W

Head to head

No previous meetings in the Metis results archive for this competition.

Model context

StatNew York City
(Home · 17 matches)
New England Revolution
(Away · 16 matches)
BTTS rate70.6%75.0%
Over 2.5 rate58.8%81.2%
Clean sheet17.6%6.2%
Avg goals3.183.12

Home stats use New York City's home record; away stats use New England Revolution's away record this season. These are completed-match rates over the samples shown above, not model probabilities — early in a season a handful of matches produces 0% and 100% readings.