Gimnasia Mendoza vs Dep. Riestra — Argentine Primera result and pre-match forecast, Saturday, 19 September 2026

Argentine Primera·Saturday, 19 September 2026

Metis pre-match forecast

Independent model — no market price

Frozen as published · 81.1 h before kick-off. Never re-computed after the match.

Gimnasia Mendoza

41%

top pick

Draw

32%

result

Dep. Riestra

27%

Final score

0–0

Top pick missed

Metis gave the draw 31.8% before kick-off, and its most likely result was a Gimnasia Mendoza win. Expected goals 1.19–0.90 against 0–0 actual.

Forecast against the result

Over 2.5 goals35%0 scored
Both teams score42%no
Gimnasia Mendoza clean sheet41%yes
Dep. Riestra clean sheet30%yes
Gimnasia Mendoza score 2+33%no
Dep. Riestra score 2+23%no

How this forecast scored

Ranked probability score0.1218
1X2 Brier score0.7094
Probability on the result31.8%

Both scores are losses: lower is better, 0 is a forecast that put all of its probability on what happened. A single fixture says nothing on its own — the league's running record is on its league page, and the model is measured against the Pinnacle opening price in the methodology.

Most likely scores before kick-off: 1–1 (14.3%), 1–0 (13.6%), 0–0 (13.4%). It finished 0–0 — one of them.

Want the model's read each week? Subscribe for free.

Recent form

Gimnasia Mendoza

23 JanAvs Central Cordoba1–0W
27 JanHvs San Lorenzo0–1L
3 FebAvs Union de Santa Fe0–4L
9 FebHvs Instituto1–0W
14 FebAvs Talleres Cordoba1–2L

Dep. Riestra

25 JanAvs Boca Juniors0–1L
29 JanHvs Defensa y Justicia0–1L
1 FebAvs Barracas Central1–1D
9 FebAvs Estudiantes L.P.0–1L
16 FebHvs Newells Old Boys1–1D

Head to head

No previous meetings in the Metis results archive for this competition.

Model context

StatGimnasia Mendoza
(Home · 15 matches)
Dep. Riestra
(Away · 15 matches)
BTTS rate46.7%20.0%
Over 2.5 rate40.0%6.7%
Clean sheet40.0%26.7%
Avg goals2.131.20

Home stats use Gimnasia Mendoza's home record; away stats use Dep. Riestra's away record this season. These are completed-match rates over the samples shown above, not model probabilities — early in a season a handful of matches produces 0% and 100% readings.