Barracas Central vs Ind. Rivadavia — Argentine Primera result and pre-match forecast, Monday, 21 September 2026

Argentine Primera·Monday, 21 September 2026

Metis pre-match forecast

Independent model — no market price

Frozen as published · 13.8 h before kick-off. Never re-computed after the match.

Barracas Central

32%

Draw

32%

Ind. Rivadavia

36%

pick · result

Final score

0–1

Top pick landed

Metis gave an Ind. Rivadavia win 36.2% before kick-off, and its most likely result was an Ind. Rivadavia win. Expected goals 1.04–1.12 against 0–1 actual.

Forecast against the result

Over 2.5 goals37%1 scored
Both teams score45%no
Barracas Central clean sheet33%no
Ind. Rivadavia clean sheet35%yes
Barracas Central score 2+28%no
Ind. Rivadavia score 2+31%no

How this forecast scored

Ranked probability score0.2560
1X2 Brier score0.6115
Probability on the result36.2%

Both scores are losses: lower is better, 0 is a forecast that put all of its probability on what happened. A single fixture says nothing on its own — the league's running record is on its league page, and the model is measured against the Pinnacle opening price in the methodology.

Most likely scores before kick-off: 1–1 (14.5%), 0–0 (12.5%), 0–1 (11.8%). It finished 0–1 — one of them.

Want the model's read each week? Subscribe for free.

Recent form

Barracas Central

24 JanHvs River Plate0–1L
28 JanAvs Aldosivi0–0D
1 FebHvs Dep. Riestra1–1D
9 FebHvs Gimnasia L.P.2–0W
16 FebAvs Rosario Central0–2L

Ind. Rivadavia

24 JanHvs Atl. Tucuman2–1W
27 JanAvs Huracan2–1W
4 FebHvs Sarmiento Junin2–1W
10 FebAvs Estudiantes Rio Cuarto1–0W
15 FebHvs Belgrano0–1L

Head to head

No previous meetings in the Metis results archive for this competition.

Model context

StatBarracas Central
(Home · 15 matches)
Ind. Rivadavia
(Away · 15 matches)
BTTS rate46.7%40.0%
Over 2.5 rate40.0%33.3%
Clean sheet33.3%40.0%
Avg goals1.872.07

Home stats use Barracas Central's home record; away stats use Ind. Rivadavia's away record this season. These are completed-match rates over the samples shown above, not model probabilities — early in a season a handful of matches produces 0% and 100% readings.