Sirius vs AIK — Swedish Allsvenskan forecast, Saturday, 24 October 2026

Swedish Allsvenskan·Saturday, 24 October 2026·13:00
Sirius

vs

13:00

1st vs 9th

AIK

Metis Forecast

Independent model — no market price

Model updated

Sirius

58%

Draw

23%

AIK

19%

Expected goals

1.97–1.06

Sirius · AIK

Sirius win 58% of the current Metis Forecast. Most likely scores: 1–1 (10.9%), 2–1 (9.9%), 2–0 (9.4%).More forecast detail +

Both teams score in 57% of simulations.

Those three cover 30% of outcomes; the other 70% is spread across every remaining scoreline.

The most likely Sirius win is 2–1 (9.9%).

Sirius score at least twice in 58%; AIK in 29%.

Scoreline distribution

Match outcomes

Both teams score57%
Over 1.5 goals81%
Over 2.5 goals58%
Over 3.5 goals36%
Over 4.5 goals19%
Team scoring & clean sheets
Sirius clean sheet35%
AIK clean sheet14%
Sirius score 2+58%
AIK score 2+29%
Sirius score 3+31%
AIK score 3+9%

Most likely scores

1–110.9%
2–19.9%
2–09.4%
1–08.8%
3–16.5%
3–06.2%

Market odds

MarketPinnacle
Sirius1.57
Draw4.53
AIK4.89

Market reference: Pinnacle. Prices shown for context, not as a best-price comparison.

Reference prices, published with the 23 Oct · 04:31 UTC model run. They are not live and will have moved since.

What changed overnight?

vs previous run
Sirius win61% → 58% ▼-3.6pp
Draw20% → 23% ▲+3.1pp
AIK win19% → 19% ▲+0.5pp

xG 2.03–1.03 → 1.97–1.06

Want the model's read each week? Subscribe for free.

Recent form

Sirius

4 AprAvs Degerfors3–0W
13 AprHvs Hammarby2–0W
18 AprHvs Vasteras SK4–1W
23 AprAvs Malmo FF3–2W
27 AprAvs Hacken2–2D

AIK

5 AprHvs Halmstad2–1W
13 AprAvs Brommapojkarna2–2D
19 AprHvs Kalmar1–0W
23 AprAvs Degerfors1–2L
27 AprHvs Malmo FF0–1L

Head to head

30 May 26AIKvsSirius0 – 3

Sirius: 1W 0D 0L in last 1

Model context

StatSirius
(Home · 12 matches)
AIK
(Away · 12 matches)
BTTS rate58.3%83.3%
Over 2.5 rate66.7%66.7%
Clean sheet25.0%16.7%
Avg goals3.672.83

Home stats use Sirius's home record; away stats use AIK's away record this season. These are completed-match rates over the samples shown above, not model probabilities — early in a season a handful of matches produces 0% and 100% readings.